April 18th, 2013

Dumb ways to Die, Smart Ways to Use Social Media

By: Monica Greenwood, Research Director

I was privileged to recently attend a seminar where guest speaker Leah Waymark, General Manager Corporate Relations of Metro Trains, shared some of the strategy and thinking behind the hugely successful ‘Dumb Ways to Die’ social media campaign.

With over 43 million hits to date and offers from train operators around the world to buy the rights to the format and the song, it’s been an amazing campaign to watch as a social media observer.  I thought NAB did particularly well with the Break-up campaign which started on Valentine’s Day last year (also a hugely successful social media campaign).  But this just takes the cake.

What I found most interesting was the reasons behind the social-media only format.  While some of it came down to budget it was also the best way to connect with their primary target audience of 14-25 year olds who are travelling on their own and think they’re immortal.  So it needed to appeal to them and help them appreciate their sometimes risk-taking behaviour as well as the potential consequences.  It was also about giving them information on their terms – allowing them to view it and absorb it when they wanted to and when they were ready to accept the messaging.

I also loved the fact that Metro were very deliberate in their use of the word ‘dumb’ which was chosen particularly as a way to be seen on YouTube.  Waymark explained that people, and in particular youth, want to see things on YouTube that are ‘dumb’…. no-one wants to see things that are ‘safe’.    And I have to agree with her.  How fun is it to get on YouTube and see silly people doing stupid things?  It’s hilarious, right?  You know you agree with me!  It’s an endless pot of gold for dumb stuff.

I’m looking forward to seeing the next ‘big thing’ in social media advertising and what their recipe for success is!

January 7th, 2013

When the people type…

By Victoria Parr, Managing Director, Latitude Insights Sydney office 

At the last AMSRS conference I presented a paper on the research to develop the design of plain packaging for tobacco products (yes, that colour…… Pantone 448C). During the questions that followed, an audience member highlighted that even though the emphasis of the conference had been on new methodologies and digital data collection, most of the papers dealing with significant social or community impact had used very traditional methods, including mine.  He was questioning the tension between the ‘new’ methodologies and the need for delivery of robust and evidence based research that is required for government research.

This is an issue that I believe many in the audience of that last conference were grappling with, especially those of us that work within the social and government sphere. Our government clients are similar to commercial clients in that they too need to do everything cheaper and faster. They are also aware of that ‘new fangled’ thing called the internet, and they know that  people now have 100′s of friends and followers whose profile pictures they see on a daily basis, and who they converse with in 140 characters or less.

How our government clients differ is that the research they do is funded by all Australian taxpayers, so all of us in the community who are relevant to the problem need to be represented in the research. It is a critical part of the democratic model of government that all have chance to express their views and opinions on matters that affect them,  and that means the research we do must be representative of the population in question.

And here lies the crux of the issue.

As I said at the conference, government needs to be accountable and need to  ensure reliability of rigorous and robust research methods to achieve this. But at the same time, the world is changing and we all know that the way people are communicating is now different. We type to communicate almost as much, if not more, than we verbalise our thoughts. As AMSRS committee member Victoria Gamble gamely said when called out to take the roving microphone at the conference ‘I don’t like to speak in front of so many people, that’s why I use twitter’.

So my question is, if we don’t start to talk to people using the same way they communicate with each other, are we in fact losing some of the rigour of the research? Not only do we miss representation of the people who will not elect to do face-to-face qual, are we also not missing a vital part of capturing their views and opinions by not communicating with them in the way they are accustomed to?

Fishkin[1] wrote about deliberative democracy and public consultation under the title ‘When the People Speak’. My question is about recognizing that how people are speaking is now, in fact, different and we in the social and government side of research need to explore this issue more, both clients and suppliers alike. All methodologies, both the tried and tested and the ‘new’ have their faults. What we really need to consider as we look at each new project or problem is what method is going to really give a voice to those whose views and opinions we are trying to represent?

 


[1] James S Fishkin, Center for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford University

July 19th, 2011

Driving Insights

by Dianne Gardiner | Tags: , , | Category: Comment , Market Research , Technology
  • Share/Bookmark

Latitude prides itself on delivering insights not information but more recently we have been focussed on driving insights more than ever (pardon the pun!).  Last week, Latitude Insights took to the motor show to check out the latest in motoring.

IMG_0236

Our first stop … the soon to be released Nissan LEAF – the first mass produced, purpose built electric vehicle to enter the Australian market.   Kerralie took to the stage to test drive a Nissan LEAF almost breaking the speedometer at 139km/hr.  This is the first time a car has been allowed to be driven inside the motor show – because the LEAF has no tail pipe emissions, it’s safe to drive inside or out.  Although with Kerralie at the wheel, I’m not sure how safe we really were ;-)

IMG_0245

Latitude is proud to be working with Nissan in the lead up to the launch of the LEAF.

Researching the LEAF is a fascinating experience for us and we are excited to be part of the changing motoring landscape.

Look out for more driving insights in the future…