To MROC or not?

To MROC or not?

Is it an MROC or isn’t it? If it isn’t, then what is it? I recently came across a blog by Robert Bain ‘Between an MROC and a hard place’, quoting comments made by Mike Hall (Verve) who said the term MROC was ‘rubbish’. Mike Hall espouses that MROCs are not research communities. He says that by having a community and only using it for research doesn’t make it a ‘research community’. Hmm, I wonder, what does that make it then?

Here at Latitude Insights we specialize in online research communities (in fact we wholeheartedly embrace them). These communities are online communities (private and usually branded) and they are used for research purposes. So, for us, that makes them online research communities.

But really, what I find most interesting is how much time and effort is spent debating the semantics of a name rather than meaningful discussion such as the merits of these online research communities (gosh, does that make them an ORC, I thought that was a fantasy warrior type thing?), and in fact social media as a whole.

Talking to consumers using a platform they are now increasingly using and comfortable with not only makes sense, it’s a must. As the latest Nielsen Online data indicates, time spent on social networking sites (such as Facebook and Twitter) is increasing at a huge rate. And that’s not going to stop any time soon. Interestingly, Australia is leading the way in terms of average time spent on these sites. On average, we Australians spent almost 7 hours on social networking sites in December 2009.

So any discussion needs to create an understanding of online research communities – the way they work and how effective they are.  Recruitment, size, management and, importantly, gathering insights and communicating them would perhaps be more pertinent than whether these communities are called MROCs or trying to prove they are ‘not research communities’.

Like this? Tell someone ...Tweet about this on TwitterShare on LinkedInShare on Google+Email this to someone

1 Comment

  1. Thanks so much for this pithy posting. As a founder of Communispace Corporation, I couldn’t agree with you more. Having recruited and run over 350private, generally branded online communities to elicit insights and drive innovation for the sponsoring brands, we share your view that symantic debates are besides the point. What matters is not what private, brand-funded online communities are called, but whether they are able to generate engagement and value for the community members (who welcome an opportunity to connect directly with peers and withthe brand and to feel heard), and for the company seeking to hardwire the voice of its customer into their business in an ongoing way.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>